IN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
- Lewis Kaplan
- 1:21-cv-05807
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In re DiDi Global Inc. Securities Litigation: Magistrate Judge Figueredo deferred sealing decisions until class certification and required a showing for permanent sealing.
Plaintiffs seeking to redact and seal class-certification materials, the defendants whose discovery materials were designated as restricted, and the parties and counsel listed as having access to the sealed documents.
What happened
In re DiDi Global Inc. Securities Litigation concerns Plaintiffs’ request to redact and seal materials supporting their reply on class certification. The requested materials included discovery materials designated by Goldman Sachs as restricted, deposition excerpts, declarations, and exhibits.
Plaintiffs said the protective order required the restricted materials to be filed under seal unless the producing party consented or the court ordered otherwise. They proposed publicly filing a redacted reply and filing an unredacted version with sealed exhibits.
Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo did not decide permanent sealing at this stage. She stated that the sealing motion would be resolved with the class-certification motion and directed Plaintiffs to make the required showing for permanent sealing by May 1, 2025.
The detailed version
- IN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION · No. 1:21-cv-05807
- Lewis Kaplan
- Apr. 10, 2025
Background
Plaintiffs, represented by counsel, requested permission to file portions of their reply supporting class certification with redactions and to file certain supporting materials under seal. The requested materials included a declaration of Dr. Rajesh Aggarwal, three exhibits to the declaration of Laurence M. Rosen, a redacted version of the Rosen declaration, and related portions of the reply brief.
Plaintiffs explained that Goldman Sachs had designated discovery materials as restricted for attorneys’ eyes only under the protective order. Those materials were attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Rosen declaration and were referenced in the declarations and brief. Plaintiffs also sought to seal excerpts from the deposition of Lead Plaintiff Alaka Holdings Ltd. and to redact quotations from those excerpts in the publicly filed brief. Plaintiffs stated that Alaka Holdings had designated the deposition transcript as confidential under the protective order.
Court’s Action
Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo ordered that the motion to seal would be resolved together with the motion for class certification. The court directed Plaintiffs to make a showing for permanently sealing the documents under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga by May 1, 2025. The opinion text does not state a final ruling granting or denying permanent sealing.
Effect
The order concerns the public availability of materials filed in connection with the class-certification motion. It affects Plaintiffs’ proposed redactions and sealed filings and the parties and counsel identified as having access to the sealed documents. It does not decide the class-certification motion or the underlying securities litigation claims.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.