Del Orbe v. 609 West Owners Corp.
- Rochon
- 1:24-cv-06368
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Del Orbe v. 609 West Owners Corp., Judge Rochon granted an adjournment after settlement, made pending motions moot, and ordered a settlement filing.
The parties to Del Orbe v. 609 West Owners Corp.; their deadlines and conferences were postponed indefinitely, and the parties were required to submit a proposed settlement agreement by April 17, 2025.
What happened
In Del Orbe v. 609 West Owners Corp., the plaintiff’s lawyer told the court that the parties had reached a settlement and planned to file the required papers. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
The lawyer asked the court to postpone all upcoming appearances, deadlines, and motion deadlines indefinitely. The court’s order also addressed a pending motion identified as Dkt. 20.
Judge Rochon granted the request, postponed all deadlines and conferences indefinitely, and ruled that any pending motions were moot. The court ordered the parties to file their proposed settlement agreement by April 17, 2025, for the review required by Second Circuit precedent, and directed the Clerk to terminate the motion at Dkt. 20.
The detailed version
- Del Orbe v. 609 West Owners Corp. · No. 1:24-cv-06368
- Rochon
- Apr. 10, 2025
Background
The plaintiff’s lawyer notified the court that the parties had reached a settlement and intended to submit the necessary papers. The lawyer requested that all upcoming appearances and deadlines, including motion deadlines, be adjourned indefinitely.
Ruling
The court granted the request. It ordered that all deadlines and conferences be adjourned indefinitely and that any pending motions were moot. The court required the parties to file their proposed settlement agreement no later than April 17, 2025, for review under the Second Circuit’s settlement-review decisions in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. and Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion at Dkt. 20.
What the Order Does Not Decide
The opinion does not state the underlying claims, the settlement’s terms, or whether the court approved the settlement. It records the parties’ reported settlement and sets a deadline for submitting the proposed agreement for review.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.