TrustLabs, Inc. v. An
- Charles Breyer
- 3:21-cv-02606
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In TrustLabs v. An, Judge Breyer denied TrustLabs’s request for judgment because statutory standing did not establish recoverable damages.
TrustLabs, Inc.’s request for a $8,203.79 final judgment against Daniel Jaiyong An was denied; the order did not enter that judgment.
What happened
In TrustLabs, Inc. v. An, TrustLabs asked the court to enter final judgment for $8,203.79 under Rule 54(b). TrustLabs relied on an earlier summary-judgment ruling stating that it had shown more than $6,000 in damages for statutory standing.
The court explained that proving the amount needed for statutory standing is different from proving how much money a plaintiff can actually recover. The earlier ruling did not grant summary judgment on damages under California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act.
Judge Charles Breyer denied TrustLabs’s motion for entry of judgment. The order did not enter the requested $8,203.79 judgment.
The detailed version
- TrustLabs, Inc. v. An · No. 3:21-cv-02606
- Charles Breyer
- Apr. 11, 2025
Background
TrustLabs, Inc. moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) for entry of final judgment against Daniel Jaiyong An in the amount of $8,203.79. TrustLabs relied on an earlier order granting summary judgment for TrustLabs and stating that TrustLabs had shown more than $6,000 in damages based on An’s conduct.
Issue
The issue was whether the earlier finding that TrustLabs met the $6,000 damages threshold for statutory standing also entitled TrustLabs to a final judgment for $8,203.79. Statutory standing refers here to the statutory requirement the court addressed before allowing the claim to proceed; it is distinct from the amount of damages a plaintiff may actually recover.
Ruling
The court denied TrustLabs’s motion for entry of judgment. It explained that satisfying the statutory-standing requirement is different from establishing the amount of recoverable damages. The earlier summary-judgment order did not grant summary judgment on damages under California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. Accordingly, the court did not enter the requested $8,203.79 judgment.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.