Reynoso v. Target Corporation
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-00235
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Reynoso v. Target Corporation, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by May 30, 2025.
Maribel Reynoso and Target Corporation; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle, subject to the conditions in the order.
What happened
In Reynoso v. Target Corporation, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and made the restoration request by May 30, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also said that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the case could not be reopened. Other deadlines, including an April 17, 2025 conference, were postponed indefinitely.
The detailed version
- Reynoso v. Target Corporation · No. 1:24-cv-00235
- Vyskocil
- Apr. 14, 2025
Background
The opinion states that the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement in principle. It does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted only if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and an application to restore the action was made by May 30, 2025.
The order states that if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely, including the conference scheduled for April 17, 2025. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on April 14, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.