Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 14, 2025

Boothe v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-03927
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ErisaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Boothe v. Reliance Standard, Judge Failla granted Boothe’s request to file the 5,113-page administrative record under seal.

Who this affects

Pearline Boothe’s privacy interests and the filing of the administrative record in the case.

What happened

In Boothe v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, Pearline Boothe asked to file under seal the administrative record in her action for long-term disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The record would be reviewed in connection with summary-judgment motions.

Boothe said the 5,113-page record contained medical records and sensitive personal information, including addresses, birth dates, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, and clinical information. Reliance Standard consented to the request.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. She allowed Boothe to file the administrative record under seal under Rule 9(c)(ii) of the court’s Individual Rules of Practice and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 31.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Boothe v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company · No. 1:24-cv-03927
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Apr. 14, 2025

Background

Pearline Boothe brought an action to recover group long-term disability benefits governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The opinion states that, on summary judgment, the court will review the administrative record compiled during the claim process. Boothe intended to file that record as the only exhibit to her summary-judgment motion.

Request to Seal

Boothe asked for permission to file the administrative record under seal. She stated that the record was 5,113 pages long and included thousands of pages of medical records containing sensitive personal information, including addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers, Social Security numbers, and clinical information she had provided during the administrative process. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company consented to the request.

Ruling

The court granted the application. It permitted Boothe to file the administrative record under seal in accordance with Rule 9(c)(ii) of the court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 31.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.