Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 17, 2025

Jennings v. City of New York

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:22-cv-01885
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jennings v. City of New York, Judge Cave granted defendants’ request to reopen Jennings’s deposition and extended summary-judgment deadlines.

Who this affects

The order affects Arabia Jennings and the defendants—City of New York, Edward Winski, and Marisa Caggiano—by reopening Jennings’s deposition and changing the summary-judgment deadlines.

What happened

In Jennings v. City of New York, the parties had certified that discovery was complete. Defendants then asked for more time to brief summary judgment and to reopen Arabia Jennings’s deposition, citing substantial changes to her testimony.

The request was unopposed. The court allowed defendants to reopen the deposition and question Jennings about the changes and her reasons for making them. It also set new deadlines for the summary-judgment motion, opposition, and reply.

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the motion. The parties must file a joint update about the reopened deposition and any later discovery by May 16, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jennings v. City of New York · No. 1:22-cv-01885
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Apr. 17, 2025

Background

On April 4, 2025, the parties certified that discovery had closed. Four days later, the defendants—City of New York, Edward Winski, and Marisa Caggiano—filed an unopposed letter-motion seeking a 60-day extension of the summary-judgment briefing schedule and permission to reopen Arabia Jennings’s deposition.

Court’s Ruling

The defendants argued that Jennings had made numerous substantial changes to her deposition testimony. The court agreed that the changes were substantial and granted the motion. It permitted the defendants to reopen the deposition and further question Jennings about the substance of the changes and her reasons for making them.

The court also extended the summary-judgment briefing schedule: the motion is due June 30, 2025; the opposition is due July 30, 2025; and the reply is due August 13, 2025. The parties must file a joint letter about the status of the reopened deposition and any post-deposition discovery by May 16, 2025. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the defendants’ motion on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.