Trippett v. 787 Coffee Roasters, LLC
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:25-cv-00202
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trippett v. 787 Coffee Roasters, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.
Alfred Trippett and 787 Coffee Roasters, LLC; the order also affected the case schedule by adjourning all deadlines and conferences and closing the case, subject to the stated 30-day restoration and reopening procedures.
What happened
In Trippett v. 787 Coffee Roasters, the parties reported that the case had been settled in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it within 30 days. It also adjourned all deadlines and conferences and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams stated that any request to reopen the case must be filed within 30 days of the order. The court also explained that a settlement-enforcement request would require the settlement terms to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within that period.
The detailed version
- Trippett v. 787 Coffee Roasters, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-00202
- Ronnie Abrams
- Apr. 16, 2025
Background
The court stated that it had been informed that the parties had settled the case in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the terms of the reported settlement.
Court’s Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it is made within 30 days. All deadlines and conferences were adjourned.
The court further ordered that any application to reopen the action be filed within 30 days of the order and warned that an application filed later may be denied solely because it was late. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Disposition
The court discontinued the action under the stated settlement-related conditions. This was a procedural disposition; the opinion did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.