Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2025

LanzaTech Global, Inc. v. Vellar Opportunity Fund SPV LLC - Series 10

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:24-cv-06362
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In LanzaTech Global v. Vellar, Judge Oetken consolidated two related contract cases into one action for all purposes.

Who this affects

LanzaTech Global, Inc. and Vellar Opportunity Fund SPV LLC - Series 10, whose two related lawsuits were consolidated for all purposes while retaining separate identities.

What happened

LanzaTech Global, Inc. sued Vellar Opportunity Fund SPV LLC - Series 10 over alleged breaches of a Forward Purchase Agreement. Vellar later filed a separate lawsuit against LanzaTech concerning the same agreement.

The parties jointly asked the court to combine the two cases. The court granted those motions and consolidated the actions for all purposes under case number 24-CV-6362.

Judge Oetken directed that filings be made in the lead case and ordered the Clerk to close the second-filed case, 24-CV-8061, for administrative purposes. The order said the consolidation did not change the parties’ rights or eliminate the separate identities of the cases.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
LanzaTech Global, Inc. v. Vellar Opportunity Fund SPV LLC - Series 10 · No. 1:24-cv-06362
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Apr. 18, 2025

Background

LanzaTech Global, Inc. filed a state-court action against Vellar Opportunity Fund SPV LLC - Series 10 on July 24, 2024. The action asserted breach of contract and related claims arising from a Forward Purchase Agreement between the parties. Vellar removed that action to the Southern District of New York on August 23, 2024.

On October 23, 2024, Vellar filed a separate action against LanzaTech in the same federal court, alleging that LanzaTech breached the same agreement.

Ruling

The parties jointly sought consolidation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), which allows related cases to be combined for coordinated handling. The court granted the joint motions and consolidated the two actions for all purposes into one action under case number 24-CV-6362, using the caption LanzaTech Global, Inc. v. Vellar Opportunity Fund SPV LLC - Series 10.

The court directed that filings in the member cases be made in the lead case and ordered the Clerk of Court to close the second-filed case, 24-CV-8061, for administrative purposes. The order also stated that the consolidated cases retain their separate identities and that the consolidation does not affect the parties’ rights in either case.

Administrative Numbering Issue

The order identifies 24-CV-6362 as the consolidated lead case but later states that filings should be made in lead case 24-CV-6562. The opinion does not explain this difference.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.