Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2025

Hossain v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:25-cv-00099
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureInsurance
In one sentence

Hossain v. Mt. Hawley: Judge Torres dismissed the negligence claim against Bass Underwriters without prejudice and removed Bass from the case.

Who this affects

The ruling removes Bass Underwriters from the case and dismisses the plaintiffs' negligence claim against it without prejudice. The plaintiffs' breach-of-contract claim against Mt. Hawley remains pending.

What happened

In Hossain v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company, Kamal Hossain and Shahla Hossain sued Mt. Hawley over insurance coverage for damage to their real property. They also sued Bass Underwriters for allegedly failing to obtain the requested insurance.

The parties who had appeared jointly asked the court to remove Bass Underwriters and dismiss the negligence claim without prejudice. The breach-of-contract claim against Mt. Hawley remains pending.

Judge Analisa Torres granted the motion, dismissed the negligence claim against Bass Underwriters without prejudice, directed the clerk to terminate Bass from the docket, and terminated the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hossain v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company · No. 1:25-cv-00099
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Apr. 18, 2025

Background

Kamal Hossain and Shahla Hossain brought a first-party property-insurance coverage dispute involving damage to real property. The opinion states that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company issued the policy and denied coverage for the plaintiffs' claim.

The plaintiffs asserted a breach-of-contract claim against Mt. Hawley for failing to pay amounts allegedly owed under the policy. They also asserted a negligence claim against Bass Underwriters for allegedly failing to obtain the insurance the plaintiffs requested, contingent on a determination that the underlying claim was not covered.

Motion and ruling

The plaintiffs and Mt. Hawley jointly moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 to drop Bass Underwriters as a party and dismiss the negligence claim against it without prejudice. The motion stated that Bass Underwriters had not appeared in the action and that the negligence claim was not ripe until the breach-of-contract claim against Mt. Hawley was decided and coverage was determined.

The court granted the motion. It dismissed the plaintiffs' negligence claim against Bass Underwriters, Inc., without prejudice; directed the clerk to terminate Bass Underwriters from the docket; and terminated the motion at ECF No. 33. The opinion states that the plaintiffs' breach-of-contract action against Mt. Hawley remains pending.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.