Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Icon…
Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Icon Construction Group
- John Cronan
- 1:25-cv-02357
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Trustees v. Icon Construction Group, Judge Cronan set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
The petitioners, Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund, and the respondent, Icon Construction Group, are affected by the briefing, service, and filing deadlines.
What happened
Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Icon Construction Group. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the award’s terms.
The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by May 19, 2025. Icon Construction Group’s opposition, if any, was due June 18, 2025, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due July 2, 2025.
Judge John P. Cronan also required the petitioners to serve the petition, supporting papers, and order electronically and by overnight mail by May 19, and to file proof of service by May 20. The order did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.
The detailed version
- Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Icon… · No. 1:25-cv-02357
- John Cronan
- Apr. 17, 2025
Background
The petitioners filed a petition on March 21, 2025, seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court considers the parties’ submissions under a procedure used to decide whether there is a genuine dispute requiring further proceedings.
Orders and Deadlines
The court ordered the petitioners to file any additional materials supporting the petition by May 19, 2025. Icon Construction Group’s opposition, if any, was due June 18, 2025. The petitioners’ reply, if any, was due July 2, 2025.
The petitioners were also ordered to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on Icon Construction Group electronically and by overnight mail no later than May 19, 2025. They had to file an affidavit confirming that service with the court no later than May 20, 2025.
Disposition
This was a scheduling and service order. The court did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed. Judge John P. Cronan ordered the specified filings and service and set the response deadlines.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.