Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 22, 2025

Perelman v. Federal Reserve District Bank of New York

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-02125
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perelman v. Federal Reserve District Bank of New York, Judge Rochon ordered U.S. Marshals service for the pro se plaintiff’s complaint.

Who this affects

Mark A. Perelman and the Federal Reserve District Bank of New York; the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service were directed to arrange service.

What happened

Mark A. Perelman filed a lawsuit claiming that the Federal Reserve District Bank of New York discriminated against him based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and disability. He brought claims under federal, New York State, and New York City laws, and the court had already allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees.

Because Perelman was allowed to proceed without paying fees, the court said he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare the summons and service paperwork and send it to the Marshals Service.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Perelman’s discrimination claims were valid; it addressed only how the lawsuit would be served.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perelman v. Federal Reserve District Bank of New York · No. 1:25-cv-02125
Judge
Rochon
Date
Apr. 22, 2025

Background

Mark A. Perelman brought this lawsuit without a lawyer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. He alleges that the Federal Reserve District Bank of New York discriminated against him because of his race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and disability. The court stated that it understood the named defendant to be the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The court had previously granted Perelman permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. In cases where a plaintiff has that permission, federal law requires the court to arrange service through the U.S. Marshals Service.

Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the defendant, issue a summons, and give the Marshals Service the documents needed to serve the defendant. The order identifies the defendant’s service address as 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045.

The court explained that service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Perelman should request additional time. The court also directed Perelman to notify the court in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so. The Clerk was directed to mail Perelman an information package.

Disposition and Effect

This is an order about service of process—the formal delivery of the lawsuit to the defendant. It does not rule on the merits of Perelman’s discrimination allegations or determine whether the defendant violated any law. The Clerk and the U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take the steps necessary to serve the defendant.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.