Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 22, 2025

Shakur Travel, LLC v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-03253
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shakur Travel v. Hiscox, Judge Furman ordered corrections to diversity allegations or remand to state court.

Who this affects

Shakur Travel, LLC, Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc., Hiscox, Inc., and DWF Claims (USA) LLC; the order particularly required the defendant to provide additional jurisdictional allegations.

What happened

Shakur Travel, LLC v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc., Hiscox, Inc., and DWF Claims (USA) LLC was removed from New York state court by DWF, which relied on diversity of citizenship for federal jurisdiction.

The removal filing identified some parties’ citizenship but did not state the citizenship of Hiscox, Inc. or the people and entities making up the two limited liability companies, as required to determine complete diversity.

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered the defendant to amend the filing by April 29, 2025; if it could not truthfully show complete diversity, the action would be remanded to state court. He also ordered service and notices of appearance within specified deadlines.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shakur Travel, LLC v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-03253
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Apr. 22, 2025

Background

DWF Claims (USA) LLC removed this action from the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, on April 18, 2025. DWF asserted that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The removal notice alleged that DWF and Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. were citizens of Illinois and that Shakur Travel, LLC was a citizen of New York. It did not allege the status or citizenship of Hiscox, Inc.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that a limited liability company is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A removal notice based on diversity therefore must identify the citizenship of the natural persons who are LLC members and, for corporate members, the states of incorporation and principal places of business. The court found that the notice did not provide this information for Shakur Travel, LLC or DWF Claims (USA) LLC. It also found that the notice contained no allegations about Hiscox, Inc.’s status or citizenship.

Order

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered the defendant to amend the notice of removal by April 29, 2025, to allege Hiscox, Inc.’s citizenship and the citizenship of each person or entity comprising the LLC parties, including the required corporate information. The court ordered that, if the defendant could not truthfully allege complete diversity by that date, the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, without further notice. The court also directed the defendant to serve the order on the plaintiff and other defendants within two business days and file proof of service. Counsel for the plaintiff and other defendants were directed to file notices of appearance within two business days after service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.