Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 24, 2025

Perez v. Salcedo Cargo Express, Inc.

Judge
Figueredo
Docket
1:23-cv-01747
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Perez v. Salcedo Cargo Express, Judge Figueredo directed the parties to decide whether to let him approve their wage settlement.

Who this affects

Moises Perez and Salcedo Cargo Express, Inc., because they must decide whether to consent to Magistrate Judge Valerio Figueredo's jurisdiction and report their decision to the court.

What happened

Moises Perez brought this Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour case against Salcedo Cargo Express, Inc. Perez asked the court to approve a settlement with the company.

The court did not approve or reject the settlement. Instead, it directed the parties to discuss whether they would consent to Magistrate Judge Valerio Figueredo deciding the settlement-approval motion.

The parties must tell Judge Figueredo by May 2, 2025, whether they consent. If they do, they must file the required consent form so Judge Figueredo can issue an order addressing the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. Salcedo Cargo Express, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-01747
Judge
Figueredo
Date
Apr. 24, 2025

Background

Moises Perez brought a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act against Salcedo Cargo Express, Inc. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Valerio Figueredo for a report and recommendation on Perez's motion to approve the parties' settlement.

Court's Action

To conserve judicial resources, the court directed the parties to meet and discuss whether they would consent to Judge Figueredo's jurisdiction for purposes of approving the settlement. The court explained that, if the parties consented, Judge Figueredo could issue an opinion and order deciding whether to approve the settlement instead of preparing a report and recommendation.

The parties were ordered to inform the court by Friday, May 2, 2025, whether they consented. If they consented, they were directed to complete and file the court's required consent form. The order did not approve or reject the settlement.

Judge and Disposition

Judge Valerio Figueredo issued the order on April 24, 2025. The order directs the parties to report whether they consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction; it does not resolve the settlement-approval motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.