Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 25, 2025

Bernabel v. Monarch Realty Holdings, LLC

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:24-cv-09937
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bernabel v. Monarch Realty Holdings, LLC, Judge Netburn declined to approve the proposed settlement and ordered defendants to answer by May 9, 2025.

Who this affects

The parties are affected: the proposed settlement was not approved, and the defendants must answer the complaint by May 9, 2025, unless the parties reach a settlement and file a joint status letter beforehand.

What happened

In Bernabel v. Monarch Realty Holdings, LLC, the parties appeared for an in-person conference on April 25, 2025. They had proposed a surrender agreement for the court’s approval.

The court declined to approve that agreement under the legal standard identified in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House. The opinion does not explain the agreement’s terms or why approval was declined.

Judge Sarah Netburn ordered the defendants to file an answer to the complaint by May 9, 2025. If the parties settled before then, they were instructed to file a joint status letter.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bernabel v. Monarch Realty Holdings, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-09937
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Apr. 25, 2025

Background

The parties appeared for an in-person conference on April 25, 2025. During the conference, the court considered a proposed Surrender Agreement.

Ruling

The court declined to approve the proposed Surrender Agreement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, a cited Second Circuit decision. The opinion does not state the agreement’s terms or give a detailed reason for the court’s decision.

The court ordered the defendants to file their answer to the complaint no later than Friday, May 9, 2025. If the parties reached a settlement before that deadline, they were ordered to file a joint status letter on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.