Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 28, 2025

In re Barnes

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:25-cv-03731
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

Barnes v. Napa State Hospital was transferred for improper venue, Judge Peterson ordered.

Who this affects

The order affects Antoine Barnes and Napa State Hospital by moving Barnes's case from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California; it does not resolve the civil-rights claim.

What happened

In Antoine Barnes v. Napa State Hospital, Barnes filed a civil-rights case without a lawyer under a federal law allowing claims against state officials. He had not paid the filing fee or applied to proceed without paying it.

The court found that Napa State Hospital and the events involved were in Napa County, which is in the Northern District of California. The case was therefore filed in the wrong federal district.

Judge Jeremy D. Peterson ordered the case transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The order did not decide the underlying civil-rights claim.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In re Barnes · No. 5:25-cv-03731
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Apr. 28, 2025

Background

Antoine Barnes, described as a civil detainee proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Napa State Hospital. The opinion states that Barnes had not paid the filing fee and had not submitted an application to proceed without paying it.

Venue

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction.

The court stated that Napa State Hospital was located in Napa County and that the claim arose there. Napa County is in the Northern District of California, so the court concluded that the case should have been filed in that district rather than the Eastern District of California.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district when transfer serves the interests of justice. Judge Jeremy D. Peterson ordered the matter transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order addressed venue and did not decide the merits of Barnes's civil-rights claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.