Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-09923
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after settlement in principle, allowing restoration by June 2, 2025.
Larysa V. Golubovych and Saks 5th Avenue, Inc.
What happened
Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc. was discontinued after the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the case had to be made by June 2, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no request to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-09923
- Vyskocil
- May 1, 2025
Background
The court was notified that Larysa V. Golubovych and Saks 5th Avenue, Inc. had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The court required any application to restore the action to be made by June 2, 2025.
Effect
If no application to restore the action was made by June 2, 2025, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice. The order resolved the case based on the reported settlement process and did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.