Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 1, 2025

Dominguez v. VPA Concrete LLC.

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:24-cv-09538
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Dominguez v. VPA Concrete, Judge Halpern ordered settlement filings by May 15, 2025, dismissed pending motions as moot, and canceled conferences.

Who this affects

The parties to Dominguez v. VPA Concrete LLC, as well as any pending motions and scheduled conferences in the case.

What happened

In Dominguez v. VPA Concrete LLC, the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The settlement was not described as final in the order.

The court ordered the parties to file by May 15, 2025, either a joint submission with a signed proposed settlement agreement or a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.

Judge Philip M. Halpern also dismissed any pending motions as moot and canceled all conferences. The order did not identify those motions or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dominguez v. VPA Concrete LLC. · No. 7:24-cv-09538
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
May 1, 2025

Background

The court stated that it had been informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The order did not provide the settlement terms or state that the settlement had been finalized.

Order

The court ordered the parties to file, by May 15, 2025, either: (1) a joint Cheeks submission and a fully executed proposed settlement agreement; or (2) a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.

The court also dismissed any pending motions as moot and canceled all conferences. The order did not identify the pending motions or resolve the underlying claims.

Disposition

Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered the specified settlement-related filing and dismissed pending motions as moot. The case’s underlying legal issues were not decided in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.