Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 2, 2025

Thorne v. Karbon Bikes, LLC

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:25-cv-03085
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureADA / Disability
In one sentence

In Thorne v. Karbon Bikes, Judge Garnett ordered settlement talks, a joint status letter, and paused Defendant’s response deadline.

Who this affects

Braulio Thorne and Karbon Bikes, LLC, along with their counsel, must follow the settlement, joint-letter, notice, and response-deadline instructions.

What happened

In Thorne v. Karbon Bikes, LLC, the court issued case-management instructions after Braulio Thorne sued Karbon Bikes, LLC in an action involving a website and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint and discuss settlement. They must also consider whether Thorne has standing and whether the website qualifies as a place open to the public under the disability law. Within 45 days after service, they must file a joint letter reporting whether they settled and, if not, proposing mediation, a settlement conference, or an initial status conference.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett also paused the deadline for Karbon Bikes to answer or otherwise respond until the joint letter is filed. The order did not decide the standing or disability-law issues and did not rule on any anticipated motion to dismiss.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thorne v. Karbon Bikes, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-03085
Judge
Garnett
Date
May 2, 2025

Order and Procedural Requirements

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. They must make a good-faith effort to settle the action.

During those discussions, the parties must consider whether Plaintiff Braulio Thorne has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing—the requirement that a plaintiff have a sufficient personal connection to the dispute to invoke the court’s authority. They must also consider whether the website involved in the action is a “standalone website,” meaning a business website without a physical location. The order notes that some courts in the Southern District of New York have held that such a website is not a “place of public accommodation” under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive.

Joint Letter and Response Deadline

Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must file a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must ask the court either to refer the case to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, while stating their preference, or to proceed with an initial status conference. The letter must also state whether Defendant Karbon Bikes, LLC intends to answer the complaint or move to dismiss it. If Karbon Bikes plans to seek dismissal, the letter must briefly describe the anticipated basis for that motion in no more than one paragraph.

The deadline for Karbon Bikes to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is stayed, meaning paused, until the joint letter is submitted. After the letter is filed, the court will set either a deadline for an answer or a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss.

Notice to Counsel

Counsel who had appeared when the order was issued must promptly provide the order and Judge Garnett’s Individual Rules and Practices to counsel for parties who had not yet appeared, notify those parties personally if their counsel is unknown, and file proof of that notice with the court.

Disposition and Scope

Judge Margaret M. Garnett entered procedural instructions concerning settlement, the parties’ joint filing, notice, and Karbon Bikes’ response deadline. The order did not decide whether Thorne has standing, whether the website is a place of public accommodation, or whether any motion to dismiss should be granted or denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.