Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 2, 2025

Munroe v. New York University

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:25-cv-03431
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Munroe v. New York University, Judge Ho ordered the Clerk and Marshals Service to serve the defendants after allowing Munroe to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Luis Ricardo Munroe and the four named defendants were affected. The Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to complete service of the lawsuit.

What happened

Luis Ricardo Munroe, who is representing himself, sued New York University, Erin Jane Lynch, the Legal Affairs Department, and the Office of Faculty Housing under several laws, including disability and fair-housing laws. The court had already allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

Because Munroe was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court said the Clerk and the U.S. Marshals Service must help serve the defendants. The court also extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued and said Munroe should ask for more time if service is not completed by then.

Judge Dale E. Ho ordered the Clerk to issue summonses, complete service forms, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. This order addressed service of the lawsuit and did not decide whether Munroe’s claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Munroe v. New York University · No. 1:25-cv-03431
Judge
Ho
Date
May 2, 2025

Background

Luis Ricardo Munroe is proceeding without a lawyer. He brings claims against New York University, Erin Jane Lynch, the Legal Affairs Department, and the Office of Faculty Housing, including claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.

In an order dated April 29, 2025, the court allowed Munroe to proceed without prepaying filing fees. This status is commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis. The present order concerns how the defendants will receive formal notice of the lawsuit, known as service of process.

Service of Process

The court explained that a plaintiff permitted to proceed without prepaying fees is entitled to assistance from the court and the U.S. Marshals Service in serving the defendants. Under the court’s instructions, the Clerk of Court must issue summonses for each defendant, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to complete service.

The court also addressed the usual 90-day service period under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Because Munroe could not have completed service before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued, the court extended the service period to 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed within that period, Munroe should request an extension of time.

Order

Judge Dale E. Ho directed the Clerk to mail Munroe an information package, issue summonses, complete the service forms with the defendants’ addresses, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. Munroe must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so. The order does not decide the merits of Munroe’s claims or whether any defendant violated the laws he cites.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.