Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 2, 2025

NY Stone Manhattan, LLC v. Cowan Logistics, LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-02850
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In NY Stone Manhattan v. Cowan Logistics, Judge Swain ordered disclosures and a status report before deciding jurisdiction and dismissal issues.

Who this affects

Cowan Logistics, LLC must disclose the citizenship of its members. NY Stone Manhattan, LLC, Cowan, and 5 Star Logistics, Inc. must meet and file the required status report.

What happened

NY Stone Manhattan, LLC sued Cowan Logistics, LLC for breach of contract and sued Cowan and 5 Star Logistics, Inc. for negligence. The case raised questions about diversity jurisdiction and whether federal law preempted the negligence claims.

The court found that the complaint did not adequately allege Cowan Logistics’ citizenship. It ordered Cowan to disclose the citizenship of its members, then ordered the parties to meet and file a report addressing whether diversity jurisdiction exists and proposing next steps for the pending and possible motions to dismiss or another amendment of the complaint.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not decide the jurisdiction questions or the motions to dismiss in this order. She directed the required disclosures and case-management steps, with deadlines of May 8 and May 16, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
NY Stone Manhattan, LLC v. Cowan Logistics, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-02850
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 2, 2025

Background

NY Stone Manhattan, LLC asserted a breach-of-contract claim against Cowan Logistics, LLC and negligence claims against Cowan and 5 Star Logistics, Inc. Cowan had moved to dismiss the negligence claim based on federal preemption, meaning Cowan argued that federal law displaced that claim. The court had also asked the parties to address subject-matter jurisdiction, including whether the Carmack Amendment completely preempted the negligence claims and created federal-question jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction Issue

The complaint invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of its members. If an LLC’s members include other business entities, the analysis may require examining the citizenship of those entities and the persons holding interests in them. The court determined that the complaint did not adequately allege Cowan’s citizenship.

Order

The court ordered Cowan to submit an updated Rule 7.1 corporate disclosure statement by May 8, 2025, identifying the citizenship of each member. After that disclosure, the parties were ordered to meet and confer and file a status report by May 16, 2025. The report must state whether the parties agree that the court has diversity jurisdiction without resolving the separate federal-question-jurisdiction issues, and must propose a schedule for Cowan’s pending motion to dismiss, any additional motions to dismiss the amended complaint or 5 Star’s crossclaims, or, alternatively, a schedule for an amendment to the complaint by consent. The order did not rule on the pending motion to dismiss, decide jurisdiction, or resolve any claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.