Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 5, 2025

Molina v. Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli Corp.

Full caption

Bautista Molina v. Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli Corp. (d/b/a Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli)

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:25-cv-01189
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Bautista Molina v. Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli, Judge Abrams ordered the parties to discuss consenting to Magistrate Judge Aaron for all further proceedings.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, defendants, and their attorneys must address whether to consent to Magistrate Judge Aaron conducting all further proceedings and must meet the applicable two-week filing requirement.

What happened

In Bautista Molina v. Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli, the parties told the court that mediation had not succeeded. The case involves Alejandro Bautista Molina and Luis Cruz as plaintiffs and Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli Corp., Armando Gonzalez, and Marcos Flores as defendants.

The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily consent to having Magistrate Judge Aaron handle all further proceedings. If they consent, they must file the completed consent form within two weeks; if any party does not consent, the parties must instead file a joint letter within two weeks without identifying who withheld consent.

Judge Ronnie Abrams issued the order on May 5, 2025. The order states that withholding consent will not have adverse consequences and reminds the parties that most settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act must be approved by the court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Molina v. Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli Corp. · No. 1:25-cv-01189
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
May 5, 2025

Background

The plaintiffs are Alejandro Bautista Molina and Luis Cruz, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The defendants are Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli Corp. (d/b/a Hunts Point Juice Bar & Deli), Armando Gonzalez, and Marcos Flores. The parties notified the court that mediation was unsuccessful.

Order Regarding Magistrate-Judge Consent

To conserve resources, promote judicial efficiency, and seek a faster disposition, the court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to conducting all further proceedings before Magistrate Judge Aaron.

If both sides consent, they must submit a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form within two weeks of the order. If the court approves the form, Magistrate Judge Aaron would conduct all further proceedings instead of Judge Abrams. Any appeal would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

If any party does not consent, the parties must file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they do not consent, without disclosing which party or parties withheld consent. The order states that withholding consent will not result in adverse consequences.

Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement Reminder

The court also reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act generally must be approved by the court, citing a Second Circuit decision.

Disposition

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the parties to discuss consent to proceed before Magistrate Judge Aaron and directed them to file either the consent form or a non-consent joint letter within two weeks. The order did not decide the merits of the parties’ claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.