Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 5, 2025

Afriyie v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-09433
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Afriyie v. NBCUniversal, Judge Swain directed counsel to confer and report whether a recent appellate decision requires changes to motions, scheduling, or briefing.

Who this affects

Counsel for both sides must meet and confer and file the required joint status report; the order may affect future motions, the case schedule, or additional briefing.

What happened

Afriyie v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC involves Amma Afriyie and Roy Campbell, individually and for others similarly situated, against NBCUniversal Media, LLC and Peacock TV, LLC.

The court directed the lawyers to consider a recent Second Circuit decision and discuss whether it affects the case. The lawyers must file a joint status report by May 14, 2025, describing any proposed new or revised motions, schedule changes, or additional briefing.

Judge Laura Swain issued this order on May 5, 2025. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying claims or rule on any motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Afriyie v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-09433
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 5, 2025

Order

The court directed counsel to review the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Solomon v. Flipps Media, Inc., No. 23-7597-CV, and to meet and confer about its possible effect on this case.

The court ordered the parties’ counsel to file a joint status report by May 14, 2025. The report must state whether they contemplate any new or revised motion practice, changes to the case schedule, or supplemental briefing.

What the Order Decided

This is a case-management order. It does not state that the court granted or denied a motion, decide the parties’ claims, or address whether either side is legally right. The opinion does not provide further details about the claims or about what effect the Second Circuit decision might have.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.