Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 9, 2025

Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-01112
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Failla ordered court-facilitated service on UFT in Fredericks’s wrongful-termination case.

Who this affects

Shakeerah Imani Fredericks, who is representing herself, and the United Federation of Teachers; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to complete service.

What happened

Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education concerns Shakeerah Imani Fredericks’s claim that she was wrongfully terminated from her employment with the New York City Department of Education. She sued the Department and the United Federation of Teachers while representing herself.

The court had previously allowed Fredericks to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. Because she was proceeding this way, the court said the court and the U.S. Marshals Service could handle service of the amended complaint. The court also extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses were issued.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for the United Federation of Teachers, complete the required service form with its address, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Fredericks an information package. The order did not decide whether Fredericks’s wrongful-termination allegations were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:24-cv-01112
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
May 9, 2025

Background

Shakeerah Imani Fredericks, representing herself, sued the New York City Department of Education and the United Federation of Teachers. She alleges that she was wrongfully terminated from her employment with the New York City Department of Education. In an earlier order dated February 15, 2024, the court allowed her to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of process

Because Fredericks was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The order specifically addressed service on the United Federation of Teachers. The court stated that the usual 90-day service period could not begin before the court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. It therefore extended the service period until 90 days after the summonses were issued.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for the United Federation of Teachers, complete the required U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the union’s address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed for service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Fredericks an information package. The court instructed Fredericks to request more time if the amended complaint was not served within 90 days after the summonses were issued. It further required her to notify the court in writing if her address changed and stated that the action could be dismissed if she failed to do so.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla’s order concerned service and case administration. It did not decide the merits of Fredericks’s wrongful-termination allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.