Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education
- Katherine Failla
- 1:24-cv-01112
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Failla ordered court-facilitated service on UFT in Fredericks’s wrongful-termination case.
Shakeerah Imani Fredericks, who is representing herself, and the United Federation of Teachers; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to complete service.
What happened
Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education concerns Shakeerah Imani Fredericks’s claim that she was wrongfully terminated from her employment with the New York City Department of Education. She sued the Department and the United Federation of Teachers while representing herself.
The court had previously allowed Fredericks to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. Because she was proceeding this way, the court said the court and the U.S. Marshals Service could handle service of the amended complaint. The court also extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses were issued.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for the United Federation of Teachers, complete the required service form with its address, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Fredericks an information package. The order did not decide whether Fredericks’s wrongful-termination allegations were valid.
The detailed version
- Fredericks v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:24-cv-01112
- Katherine Failla
- May 9, 2025
Background
Shakeerah Imani Fredericks, representing herself, sued the New York City Department of Education and the United Federation of Teachers. She alleges that she was wrongfully terminated from her employment with the New York City Department of Education. In an earlier order dated February 15, 2024, the court allowed her to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
Service of process
Because Fredericks was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The order specifically addressed service on the United Federation of Teachers. The court stated that the usual 90-day service period could not begin before the court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. It therefore extended the service period until 90 days after the summonses were issued.
Order
The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for the United Federation of Teachers, complete the required U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the union’s address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed for service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Fredericks an information package. The court instructed Fredericks to request more time if the amended complaint was not served within 90 days after the summonses were issued. It further required her to notify the court in writing if her address changed and stated that the action could be dismissed if she failed to do so.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla’s order concerned service and case administration. It did not decide the merits of Fredericks’s wrongful-termination allegations.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.