Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 12, 2025

Banco Credit Suisse, S.A. v. Helguero Ruiz

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:25-cv-03020
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In Banco Credit Suisse (Mexico), S.A. v. Helguero Ruiz, Judge Ho granted redactions and sealed filings protecting Rafael Helguero Ruiz’s personal information.

Who this affects

Banco Credit Suisse (Mexico), S.A., Casa de Bolsa Credit Suisse (Mexico) S.A. de C.V., and Rafael Helguero Ruiz; the ruling limits public access to specified filings containing Mr. Helguero Ruiz’s home address and telephone number.

What happened

Banco Credit Suisse (Mexico), S.A. and Casa de Bolsa Credit Suisse (Mexico) S.A. de C.V. asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Rafael Helguero Ruiz. An exhibit to their petition contained Mr. Helguero Ruiz’s home address and telephone number.

The petitioners asked to redact that information and seal the unredacted exhibit. Their filing said the request was made with Mr. Helguero Ruiz’s consent and at his request, and that he had acknowledged service, accepted electronic service through his counsel in Mexico, waived additional personal service, and agreed not to oppose confirmation of the award.

The court found the proposed redactions narrowly tailored and said the address and telephone number were private information with no bearing on the lawsuit. Judge Dale E. Ho granted the application, directed the clerk to seal ECF No. 5-1 and keep ECF No. 11-1 under seal with access limited to the applicable parties, and directed the clerk to terminate ECF No. 10.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Banco Credit Suisse, S.A. v. Helguero Ruiz · No. 1:25-cv-03020
Judge
Ho
Date
May 12, 2025

Background

Banco Credit Suisse (Mexico), S.A. and Casa de Bolsa Credit Suisse (Mexico) S.A. de C.V. are the petitioners in an action seeking confirmation of a final arbitration award against Rafael Helguero Ruiz. The petitioners attached a copy of the award as Exhibit A to a declaration supporting their petition. The exhibit included Mr. Helguero Ruiz’s home address and telephone number.

Sealing request

The petitioners asked the court to approve redactions of that personal information and to seal ECF No. 5-1, which contained the unredacted exhibit. The request relied on Rule 6 of Judge Ho’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The petitioners stated that the request was made with Mr. Helguero Ruiz’s consent and at his request. They also stated that he had acknowledged service and actual notice, consented to electronic service through his counsel in Mexico, waived any additional personal service required by potentially applicable international agreements, and stipulated that he did not oppose confirmation of the final arbitration award.

Court’s analysis

The court recognized a presumption that judicial documents are available to the public. It nevertheless found that the proposed redactions were narrowly tailored. The court concluded that a home address could be partially redacted under the applicable rule and that a telephone number was traditionally private information, had no bearing on the lawsuit, and could be withheld without prejudicing the public.

Disposition

Judge Dale E. Ho granted the application. The clerk was directed to place ECF No. 5-1 under seal with access limited to the applicable parties, keep ECF No. 11-1 under seal with access limited to the applicable parties, and terminate ECF No. 10.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.