Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 9, 2025

Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-02617
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Preliminary InjunctionCivil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections, Judge Woods denied Piccolo’s request to be placed on the Democratic primary ballot.

Who this affects

Arthur Piccolo and the New York City Board of Elections; the order also directed notice to the New York Attorney General.

What happened

Piccolo asked the court to order the New York City Board of Elections to place him on the Democratic primary ballot for New York City mayor. The court held a hearing on May 8, 2025, after issuing an earlier order asking why the requested order should not be granted.

The court denied Piccolo’s request for a preliminary injunction. It directed the Board to obtain and give Piccolo a copy of the hearing transcript. If Piccolo continues the case, he must notify the New York Attorney General about his challenge to the constitutionality of New York statutes; the deadline for a proposed notice was May 15, 2025. Discovery was stayed until that notice was served and the Board answered or otherwise responded to the complaint.

Judge Gregory H. Woods also denied Piccolo permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk was directed to terminate the motions listed at Docket Nos. 10 and 21.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Piccolo v. New York City Board of Elections · No. 1:25-cv-02617
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
May 9, 2025

Background

Arthur Piccolo sought an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 requiring the New York City Board of Elections to place him on the Democratic primary ballot for the election for New York City mayor. On April 15, 2025, the court issued an order to show cause—an order requiring a party to explain why requested relief should not be granted. The court held a hearing on May 8, 2025.

Ruling on Preliminary Relief

For the reasons discussed on the record during the May 8 hearing, the court denied Piccolo’s application for a preliminary injunction. The written opinion does not provide those reasons.

Directions Concerning the Case

The Board was directed to obtain a copy of the hearing transcript and provide it to Piccolo. If Piccolo wishes to continue the litigation, he must serve a notice on the New York Attorney General identifying the constitutional question presented by his challenge to New York statutes, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.1(a). Because Piccolo is proceeding without paying the filing fee, he may file his proposed notice with the court, which will direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve it for him. The proposed notice was due no later than May 15, 2025.

The court also stayed discovery—information gathering between the parties—until the notice is served on the New York Attorney General and the Board files an answer or another response to the complaint.

Appeal and Clerk’s Directions

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Piccolo permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motions pending at Docket Nos. 10 and 21.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.