Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2025

American Grill Investor LLC v. Admiral Indemnity Company

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:25-cv-02987
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In American Grill Investors v. Admiral Indemnity, Judge Garnett found diversity allegations insufficient and allowed plaintiffs 45 days to amend.

Who this affects

American Grill Investors LLC and RHS WINELLC d/b/a The Tavern by WS must provide additional citizenship information or notify the court of certain New Jersey or Delaware citizenship within 45 days; Admiral Indemnity Company is affected by the court’s review of the claimed diversity jurisdiction.

What happened

American Grill Investors LLC and RHS WINELLC d/b/a The Tavern by WS sued Admiral Indemnity Company in New York state court, and the case was moved to federal court based on claimed diversity of citizenship. Both plaintiffs are limited liability companies.

The court said the plaintiffs had not identified the citizenship of every member of each LLC. It also noted that the defendant’s filings gave inconsistent information about whether it was a New Jersey or Delaware corporation.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett allowed the plaintiffs 45 days to file an amended complaint with the required citizenship information. Alternatively, they may file a letter identifying any direct or indirect New Jersey or Delaware citizenship during that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
American Grill Investor LLC v. Admiral Indemnity Company · No. 1:25-cv-02987
Judge
Garnett
Date
May 13, 2025

Background

The action was removed from New York state court to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 10, 2025, purportedly based on diversity jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction generally requires the parties to be citizens of different states, and those citizenship facts must be clearly alleged.

Both plaintiffs are limited liability companies. The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship is determined by the citizenship of all its members, not by the state where the LLC was formed or its principal place of business. If an LLC member is itself an LLC, the citizenship of that LLC’s members must also be identified. The complaint and corporate disclosure statement did not provide this information. The court also required the complaint to provide specified citizenship information for any corporate, limited liability partnership, or limited partnership members.

Jurisdictional Issue

The court addressed subject-matter jurisdiction at the outset. It found that the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged the citizenship of their members, including members that were themselves LLCs. The court also noted a discrepancy: the complaint described Admiral Indemnity Company as a corporation formed under New Jersey law, while the notice of removal described it as a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. The court directed that the discrepancy be addressed in any amended complaint.

Ruling

Within 45 days, the plaintiffs may file an amended complaint expressly alleging the citizenship of all relevant members and entities. Alternatively, if any direct or indirect member is a citizen of New Jersey or Delaware, the plaintiffs may notify the court by letter identifying that person or entity and its relationship to the plaintiffs. The order does not state that the action was dismissed or remanded.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.