Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2025

Stocking v. Newmark Knight Frank Valuation & Advisory, LLC

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:22-cv-07347
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryPro Se
In one sentence

In Stocking v. Newmark, Judge Ramos granted Maria Stocking’s request to file a letter about alleged cyberattack-related data loss under seal.

Who this affects

Maria Stocking and Newmark Knight Frank Valuation & Advisory, LLC, particularly their access to the letter and the public’s access to the information it contains.

What happened

In Stocking v. Newmark Knight Frank Valuation & Advisory, LLC, Maria Stocking, representing herself, asked to file a letter under seal about alleged cyberattacks and the loss of electronically stored information related to the case.

Stocking said the letter contained sensitive account information, forensic findings, intrusion methods, and recovery efforts. She also said public disclosure could expose remaining information and interfere with efforts to recover digital evidence.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the request to file the letter under seal and directed the Clerk of Court to change access to sealed Letter 205. The available order does not state the specific access setting because that portion of the text is incomplete.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stocking v. Newmark Knight Frank Valuation & Advisory, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07347
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
May 14, 2025

Background

Maria Stocking, proceeding without a lawyer, moved for permission to file under seal a letter notifying the court about the alleged loss of electronically stored information relevant to the litigation. Stocking said that a series of cyberattacks beginning February 3, 2025, wiped her physical electronic devices and synchronized cloud storage, eliminating more than four years of communications and documents related to the case.

Stocking said the proposed letter described alleged cyber harassment involving her electronic filing email account, compromised accounts, forensic findings, intrusion methods, and containment and recovery efforts. She said the affected materials included cloud archives, two personal computers, mobile phones, and multiple USB drives. She also said that public disclosure could risk further breaches, expose unresolved security vulnerabilities, and interfere with efforts to obtain digital evidence from third parties.

Motion and ruling

Stocking relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c), the court’s electronic filing rules, and the standard described in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. She argued that the sensitive security and evidence-related information justified sealing. The opinion text states that the request to file the letter under seal was granted. It also directs the Clerk of Court to change access to sealed Letter 205, but the available text ends before specifying the resulting access level.

Judge Edgardo Ramos did not, in this order, decide whether the alleged cyberattacks occurred, whether evidence was lost, whether Stocking violated a discovery obligation, or the merits of the underlying case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.