Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2025

Trustees For The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Triangle…

Full caption

Trustees For The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund v. Triangle Enterprises NYC, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-08982
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees v. Triangle Enterprises, Judge Broderick set deadlines for materials on confirming an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners and Triangle Enterprises NYC, Inc.; the order establishes deadlines and service requirements but does not decide the petition to confirm the arbitration award.

What happened

Trustees for the Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund filed a complaint seeking to confirm an arbitration award against Triangle Enterprises NYC, Inc. The petitioners filed the complaint on November 25, 2024, and docketed an affidavit showing service on January 7, 2025.

The court explained that proceedings to confirm or cancel arbitration awards are handled much like motions for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by June 16, 2025. Any opposition from Triangle Enterprises was due July 14, 2025, and any reply from the petitioners was due July 28, 2025.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick also ordered the petitioners to serve the order on Triangle Enterprises and file proof of that service. The order set a briefing schedule and did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees For The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Triangle… · No. 1:24-cv-08982
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
May 14, 2025

Background

The petitioners filed a complaint on November 25, 2024, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. On January 7, 2025, they docketed an affidavit of service. The opinion does not describe the arbitration award or the underlying dispute.

Court’s Analysis

The court stated that proceedings to confirm or vacate arbitration awards must be treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment. The court therefore directed the petitioners to provide any additional materials supporting confirmation before the opposition and reply deadlines.

Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve additional supporting materials by June 16, 2025. Triangle Enterprises’s opposition, if any, was due July 14, 2025, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due July 28, 2025. The court also ordered the petitioners to serve a copy of the order on Triangle Enterprises and file an affidavit certifying that service occurred. The order did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.