District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron…
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron Painting Co.
- Thomas Hixson
- 3:23-cv-00458
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 4
In District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron Painting Co., Judge Hixson denied Littler’s request to stop serving filings on its former clients.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. and its attorneys must continue serving filed documents on the former defendant-clients—Herron Painting Co., Herron Painting, Inc., Kevin Herron, and Dora Herron—until substitute counsel files a substitution of counsel.
What happened
In District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron Painting Co., the court considered whether Littler Mendelson, P.C. and its attorneys could end their remaining obligation to serve court filings on former defendant-clients.
Littler had previously been allowed to withdraw as the defendants’ lawyers, but the court required Littler to remain counsel of record for serving documents because the defendants had not hired replacement counsel or agreed to represent themselves. Littler asked the court to lift that condition. No opposition was filed.
Judge Thomas S. Hixson denied the motion. He ordered Littler to continue serving all filed documents on the defendants until substitute counsel files a notice of appearance, and to file proof of service within three business days after each filing.
The detailed version
- District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Herron… · No. 3:23-cv-00458
- Thomas Hixson
- May 19, 2025
Background
The plaintiffs brought the case under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, alleging that the defendants failed to report and pay required contributions and union dues under bargaining and trust agreements. Littler Mendelson, P.C. represented the defendants, which included Herron Painting Co., Herron Painting, Inc., Kevin Herron, and Dora Herron.
On April 19, 2024, the court granted Littler’s motion to withdraw as counsel. Because the defendants had not consented to the withdrawal and had not filed a substitution of counsel, the court required Littler to remain counsel of record for purposes of serving filed documents on the defendants until substitute counsel appeared. The court later extended the deadline for the defendants to obtain substitute counsel. The court then entered default against Herron Painting Co. and Herron Painting, Inc. Plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment against the entity defendants and for summary judgment against the individual defendants were pending when this order was issued.
Motion
On April 9, 2025, Littler filed an administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 seeking relief from the remaining conditions of its withdrawal. In particular, Littler asked the court to end its obligation to remain counsel of record for serving documents on the defendants. Littler argued that the defendants had had enough time and opportunity to learn that they needed new counsel and to obtain new counsel. No opposition was filed.
Court’s reasoning
Civil Local Rule 11-5 permits a withdrawal order to require continued service on former counsel when the client has not appeared through substitute counsel or agreed to proceed without a lawyer. The court agreed that the defendants had had ample time to obtain new counsel. But none of the defendants had filed a notice of appearance for substitute counsel, and the individual defendants had not agreed to represent themselves. The only contact information on file was for Littler attorneys Courtney Chambers and Sarah Bryan Fask. Relieving Littler of the service obligation would leave the court without a means of notifying the defendants about filings in the case.
Disposition
Judge Thomas S. Hixson denied Littler’s motion. Littler must remain counsel of record for serving all filed documents on the defendants until a substitution of counsel is filed. For each such document, Littler must file proof of service within three business days after filing.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.