7th City Realty LLC v. Boba Guys, Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:24-cv-00215
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In 7th City Realty v. Boba Guys, Judge Abrams discontinued the case without costs after settlement in principle, allowing restoration within 30 days.
7th City Realty LLC, Empire 345 Seventh LLC, and Boba Guys, Inc.; the action was closed, subject to a 30-day opportunity to seek restoration and a 30-day period for placing any settlement-enforcement agreement on the public record for court approval.
What happened
7th City Realty LLC and Empire 345 Seventh LLC sued Boba Guys, Inc. The court reported that the parties had settled the case in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 30 days. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also said that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.
The detailed version
- 7th City Realty LLC v. Boba Guys, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00215
- Ronnie Abrams
- May 19, 2025
Background
The court stated that it had been informed that the parties had settled the case in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It stated that any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
The court further ordered that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The court did not decide the merits of the underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.