Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 20, 2025

Stelzer v. The Publisher Desk LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-01401
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Stelzer v. The Publisher Desk LLC, Judge Rochon set deadlines and a hearing for Plaintiff’s default-judgment motion without deciding it.

Who this affects

Brigitte Stelzer and The Publisher Desk LLC, as well as any defendants referred to in the order, were affected by the deadlines, hearing, and service requirements.

What happened

In Stelzer v. The Publisher Desk LLC, Brigitte Stelzer filed a motion seeking a default judgment under federal and local court rules on May 19, 2025.

The court ordered the defendants to file any opposition by June 10, 2025, and scheduled a default-judgment hearing for June 17, 2025. The court also required Stelzer to serve the order and file proof of service. It did not grant or deny the default-judgment motion.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon also warned that corporate entities must appear in federal court through licensed lawyers and that repeated failure to do so may lead to a default judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stelzer v. The Publisher Desk LLC · No. 1:25-cv-01401
Judge
Rochon
Date
May 20, 2025

Background

On May 19, 2025, Brigitte Stelzer filed a motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) and Local Civil Rule 55.2(b). A default judgment is a judgment that may be entered when a party fails to defend the case.

Court’s Orders

The court ordered the defendants to file any opposition to the motion by June 10, 2025. It cautioned that corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel and stated that repeated failure by an entity to appear through counsel may support entry of a default judgment.

The court also scheduled a default-judgment hearing for June 17, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 20B of the United States Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. If a defendant appeared or opposed the motion before the hearing, the parties were required to promptly notify the court; the court could then adjourn the hearing or treat it as an initial pretrial conference for an appearing defendant.

Service Requirement and Disposition

The court ordered Stelzer to serve the defendants with a copy of the order within two business days after filing and to file proof of service within two business days after service. The order set procedures and a hearing for the pending motion; it did not grant or deny the motion for default judgment. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon signed the order on May 20, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.