Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 20, 2025

Pitt v. County of Rockland

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:25-cv-03781
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryPro Se
In one sentence

In Pitt v. County of Rockland, Judge Halpern ordered service and required defendants to respond to prisoner discovery requests.

Who this affects

Malcolm Pitt, the County of Rockland, Correctional Officer Salvatore Librizzi, the Clerk of Court, and the United States Marshals Service.

What happened

In Pitt v. County of Rockland, Malcolm Pitt, who is incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer, sued the County of Rockland and Correctional Officer Salvatore Librizzi for alleged federal constitutional and state-law violations.

Because Pitt had permission to proceed without paying filing fees in advance, the court directed the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to issue summonses and serve the defendants. The court stated that service must occur within 90 days after the summonses are issued and that Pitt must notify the court of any address change.

Judge Philip M. Halpern also ordered the defendants to answer specified discovery requests under Local Civil Rule 33.2 within 120 days after being served. The order addressed service and discovery procedures, not whether Pitt’s claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pitt v. County of Rockland · No. 7:25-cv-03781
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
May 20, 2025

Background

Malcolm Pitt, who is incarcerated at Collins Correctional Facility, brought the action without a lawyer against the County of Rockland and Correctional Officer Salvatore Librizzi. The court construed the complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal civil-rights statute, and under state law. Pitt seeks damages. The court had previously granted Pitt permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of the Complaint

Because Pitt was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court directed that he may rely on the court and the United States Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The Clerk of Court was ordered to issue a summons for each defendant, complete a USM-285 form for each defendant, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the summonses and complaint.

The court stated that service must be completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed within that period, Pitt should ask for more time. Pitt must also notify the court in writing if his address changes; the court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Discovery Requirement

The court determined that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies. That rule requires certain defendants in some prisoner actions to respond to specified discovery requests. The defendants must serve responses to the standard interrogatories and document requests within 120 days after service of the summons and complaint, and their responses must quote each request verbatim.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to mail Pitt an information package, issue summonses, complete the service forms, and deliver the necessary papers to the United States Marshals Service. It further directed the defendants to comply with Local Civil Rule 33.2 within 120 days after service. This order did not decide the merits of Pitt’s federal or state-law claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.