Morrison v. Healthfirst, Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:23-cv-01020
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Morrison v. Healthfirst, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without prejudice to timely restoration.
Joseph Morrison and Healthfirst, Inc., HE Management Services, LLC, Kenneth Schwartz, and Christer Johnson.
What happened
In Morrison v. Healthfirst, Inc., the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the docket if an application was filed within 30 days. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also said that any request for the court to keep authority to enforce a settlement had to place the agreement’s terms on the public record and receive the court’s approval within the same 30-day period.
The detailed version
- Morrison v. Healthfirst, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-01020
- Ronnie Abrams
- May 21, 2025
Background
The court stated that it had been reported that the case had been settled in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or state that the agreement had been finally completed.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
The court further ordered that any application to reopen the action had to be filed within 30 days of the order, and that an application filed later could be denied solely because it was late. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—meaning authority—to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within that same 30-day period.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.