Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 21, 2025

Standard Insurance Company v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:25-cv-00212
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Standard Insurance v. Minnesota Life, Judge Broderick granted leave to file specified materials under seal or with redactions to protect commercially sensitive information.

Who this affects

Standard Insurance Company, Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Securian Financial Group, Inc., and members of the public seeking access to the filings.

What happened

Standard Insurance Company asked in Standard Insurance Company v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company for permission to seal its legal brief and an exhibit, and to file a public version of the brief with redactions. The materials concerned Standard’s request to partially dismiss counterclaims or require arbitration.

Standard said the materials contained commercially sensitive information about the parties’ transaction, possible earn-out payments, and clients that had ended or planned to end their plans. Minnesota Life Insurance Company and Securian Financial Group, Inc. agreed to the requested sealing and redactions.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick granted the application. The order permitted Standard to file the brief under seal, file a redacted public version, and file the exhibit under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Standard Insurance Company v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company · No. 1:25-cv-00212
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
May 21, 2025

Background

Standard Insurance Company asked the court for permission to file three items with restricted public access: its brief supporting a motion to partially dismiss counterclaims or compel arbitration, a public version of that brief containing redactions, and an exhibit to a declaration. Minnesota Life Insurance Company and Securian Financial Group, Inc., referred to collectively as the Securian Entities, consented to the request.

Reason for the Request

Standard represented that the brief and exhibit discussed commercially sensitive information concerning the parties’ transaction, potential earn-out payments, and the number and percentage of clients that terminated or discontinued their plans or gave written notice of their definitive intent to do so. The request relied on the court’s obligation to balance the public’s right to access judicial documents against privacy interests and the potential competitive harm from disclosure. Standard also stated that the court had previously granted requests to seal similar information.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick granted the application. The court granted Standard leave to file the brief with redactions, the brief under seal, and the exhibit under seal. The opinion does not rule on Standard’s request to partially dismiss the counterclaims or compel arbitration.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.