Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 21, 2025

Mallgren v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04002
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Mallgren v. United States, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

The judgment dismisses Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States and denies Mallgren permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Mallgren v. United States, Anthony Brian Mallgren sued the United States. The judgment refers to a May 20, 2025, order for the reasons behind the dismissal, but that order is not included here.

The court dismissed the action. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on May 21, 2025. The judgment does not explain the underlying basis for dismissal beyond referring to the earlier order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mallgren v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-04002
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 21, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing Anthony Brian Mallgren’s action against the United States. The judgment states that the reasons for dismissal were provided in a May 20, 2025, order, which is not included in the provided text.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. Based on that certification, it denied Mallgren permission to proceed with an appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

What the Provided Text Does Not Establish

Because the May 20 order is not provided, this judgment alone does not identify the legal or factual basis for dismissal. It also does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.