Medpace, Inc. v. Agenus Inc.
- Jesse Furman
- 1:25-cv-04179
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Medpace v. Agenus, Judge Furman ordered Medpace to provide citizenship details supporting diversity jurisdiction or face dismissal.
Medpace must amend its complaint to provide the required citizenship allegations. Agenus Inc. and Equiniti Trust Company, LLC are the defendants whose citizenship information affects whether the federal court may hear the case.
What happened
Medpace, Inc. v. Agenus Inc. involves Medpace’s lawsuit against Agenus Inc. and Equiniti Trust Company, LLC. Medpace relied on diversity jurisdiction, which allows a federal court to hear certain disputes between citizens of different states.
Medpace alleged that it was a citizen of Ohio and that Agenus was a citizen of Delaware and Massachusetts. But it did not adequately identify the citizenship of every member of Equiniti, a limited liability company. The court said that information was required to determine whether diversity jurisdiction existed.
Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered Medpace to amend its complaint by May 28, 2025, to provide the required citizenship information for Equiniti’s members and all individual parties. If Medpace cannot truthfully allege complete diversity, the court said the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice.
The detailed version
- Medpace, Inc. v. Agenus Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-04179
- Jesse Furman
- May 21, 2025
Background
Medpace, Inc. sued Agenus Inc. and Equiniti Trust Company, LLC. The complaint invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Diversity jurisdiction is a basis for federal-court authority that generally requires complete diversity of citizenship between the opposing parties.
Medpace alleged that it was a citizen of Ohio and that Agenus was a citizen of Delaware and Massachusetts. For Equiniti, however, Medpace alleged only, on information and belief, that it was a New York limited liability company with Delaware and/or New York members.
Court’s Analysis
The court explained that a limited liability company is considered a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction therefore must identify the citizenship of each LLC member. If a member is an individual, the complaint must allege that person’s citizenship. If a member is a corporation or another LLC, the complaint must provide the required citizenship information for that entity and, when applicable, trace the citizenship through additional LLC members. The court also stated that citizenship must be affirmatively pleaded rather than alleged only in conclusory terms.
The court concluded that Medpace’s complaint did not affirmatively plead the citizenship of each member of Equiniti.
Order
The court ordered Medpace to amend its complaint by May 28, 2025. The amended complaint must affirmatively allege the citizenship of each person or entity comprising Equiniti and the citizenship of all individual parties. If Medpace cannot truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship, the court stated that the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice. The order did not decide the merits of the underlying dispute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.