Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2025

Lee v. HDR Global Trading Limited

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:20-cv-03232
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lee v. HDR Global Trading Limited, Judge Aaron ordered Drew Lee to state whether he would continue without a lawyer, warning that noncompliance could lead to sanctions or dismissal.

Who this affects

Drew Lee, who was ordered to state whether he intended to continue pursuing his claims without a lawyer; the order also warned that noncompliance could affect his claims.

What happened

In Lee v. HDR Global Trading Limited, Drew Lee had been ordered to tell the court whether he intended to continue pursuing his claims without a lawyer. He did not file the required letter by the earlier deadline.

The court gave Lee until June 17, 2025, to file the letter. It said he could submit it in person or by email to the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron warned that failing to follow the order could lead to sanctions, including dismissal of Lee’s claims for failing to pursue the case. This order did not itself dismiss the claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lee v. HDR Global Trading Limited · No. 1:20-cv-03232
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
May 27, 2025

Background

The case was brought by Drew Lee and Felix Lufkin, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against HDR Global Trading Limited and other defendants. Under an earlier April 28, 2025 order, Lee was required to file a letter by May 9, 2025, stating whether he intended to continue prosecuting his claims without a lawyer. The order states that Lee had not filed the letter.

Order

The court ordered Lee to file the letter no later than June 17, 2025. The letter could be submitted in person to the Pro Se Intake Unit at the federal courthouse or emailed to the address listed in the order.

Effect of the Order

The court warned that failure to comply could result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of Lee’s claims for failure to prosecute. The order did not impose sanctions or dismiss the claims. Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered the order as a United States magistrate judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.