Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2025

Levi v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:22-cv-09524
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Levi v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Judge Preska declined Shelley Levi’s request to seal the case because personal interests did not overcome public access.

Who this affects

Shelley Levi and public access to the court’s records.

What happened

Levi v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center concerns Shelley Levi’s May 19, 2025 request to seal the case.

The court said that Levi’s personal interest did not overcome the strong presumption that court records should be open to the public. The court cited decisions rejecting reputation-related concerns as sufficient to justify sealing.

Judge Loretta A. Preska did not grant the request to seal the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Levi v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center · No. 1:22-cv-09524
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
May 27, 2025

Request

Shelley Levi sent the court a letter dated May 19, 2025, asking that the case be sealed.

Court’s Analysis

The court stated that it sympathized with Levi but could not grant the request because her personal interest did not override the presumption of public access to court records. The court relied on decisions holding that potential reputation harm, and possible harm to employment prospects, did not meet the demanding standard for overcoming the presumption that court records are open.

Disposition

The court did not grant Levi’s request to seal the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.