Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 28, 2025

Thomas v. Mastercard Inc.

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:25-cv-04279
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
EmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Thomas v. Mastercard, Judge Roman ordered the Marshals Service to serve Mastercard in Thomas’s discrimination case.

Who this affects

Brenda Thomas, Mastercard, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Brenda Thomas brought Thomas v. Mastercard under Title VII and New York’s state and city human-rights laws. The court had already allowed her to proceed without paying filing fees or having a lawyer.

The court ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, prepare the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service so it could serve Mastercard. The court set the service deadline at 90 days after the summons is issued and said Thomas should request more time if service is not completed by then.

Judge Nelson S. Roman also directed Thomas to notify the court in writing if her address changes and warned that the case could be dismissed if she fails to do so. The order addressed service of the lawsuit, not whether Thomas’s discrimination claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thomas v. Mastercard Inc. · No. 7:25-cv-04279
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
May 28, 2025

Background

Brenda Thomas filed this pro se action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. The court had granted her permission to proceed without paying filing fees on May 23, 2025.

Service of the Lawsuit

Because Thomas was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Mastercard. The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue a summons for Mastercard, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Mastercard’s service address, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The court extended the service period so that Thomas has 90 days after the summons is issued to complete service. If service is not completed within that period, the court stated that Thomas should request an extension of time. The order also required Thomas to notify the court in writing if her address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if she does not do so.

Ruling

Judge Nelson S. Roman ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, prepare the service materials, and provide them to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Thomas a copy of the order and an information package. The order did not decide the merits of Thomas’s discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.