Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 29, 2025

Robert Miller Photographer, LLC v. Experia Moving Inc.

Judge
Lewis Kaplan
Docket
1:25-cv-00394
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Robert Miller Photographer, LLC v. Experia Moving Inc., Magistrate Judge Netburn ordered a default-judgment motion and hearing after Experia failed to appear.

Who this affects

Robert Miller Photographer, LLC and Experia Moving Inc., particularly Experia because it had not appeared and was ordered to respond to the potential default judgment.

What happened

Robert Miller Photographer, LLC served Experia Moving Inc. with an order requiring Experia to appear by May 23, 2025, but Experia had not appeared when this order was filed. The plaintiff had already obtained a certificate of default.

The court ordered the plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment by June 11, 2025, supported by evidence about service of the lawsuit and the legal basis for that service. Experia may oppose the motion by June 25, 2025.

Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn also ordered Experia to appear and explain on June 30, 2025, why default judgment should not be entered. The order did not itself enter default judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robert Miller Photographer, LLC v. Experia Moving Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-00394
Judge
Lewis Kaplan
Date
May 29, 2025

Background

On May 12, 2025, the court ordered Experia Moving Inc. to appear by May 23, 2025. The plaintiff served Experia with that order on May 20, 2025. As of May 29, Experia had not appeared. The plaintiff had already obtained a certificate of default.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the plaintiff to file, by June 11, 2025, a motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) and Local Civil Rule 55.2(b). The motion must include an attorney’s affidavit or declaration explaining the basis for default judgment, how and when the summons and complaint were served, and why that service was legally proper.

The court set June 25, 2025, as the deadline for Experia to oppose the motion. It also reminded Experia that a corporation may appear in federal court only through a licensed lawyer and ordered Experia to appear and show cause on June 30, 2025, at 3:30 p.m., why default judgment should not be entered. The plaintiff must immediately serve the order and later serve the motion, then file proof of that service.

Result and Classification

This order set procedures for deciding whether to enter default judgment; it did not itself enter default judgment. Because the order concerns a default-based procedural step rather than a decision on the underlying claims, it is classified as a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.