Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled June 2, 2025

Obillo v. i-Health Inc.

Judge
Kang
Docket
3:24-cv-02459
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Obillo v. i-Health Inc., Judge Kang closed the case after dismissing individual claims with prejudice and putative class claims without prejudice.

Who this affects

Malia Obillo’s individual claims were dismissed with prejudice, while her putative class claims were dismissed without prejudice. No certified class was affected, and the case was closed on the docket.

What happened

In Obillo v. i-Health Inc., Malia Obillo and i-Health Inc. jointly agreed to dismiss the case. The agreement dismissed Obillo’s individual claims with prejudice and her putative class claims without prejudice.

The court said the dismissal took effect under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 without further court approval. Because no class had been certified, the court also said that notice to putative class members and approval under Rule 23(e) were not required.

Judge Peter H. Kang directed the clerk to terminate the action from the court’s docket. The order was entered on June 2, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Obillo v. i-Health Inc. · No. 3:24-cv-02459
Judge
Kang
Date
June 2, 2025

Background

Malia Obillo and i-Health Inc. filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. The parties agreed to dismiss Obillo’s individual claims with prejudice and her putative class claims without prejudice. No class had been certified in the case.

Court’s Analysis

The court determined that the stipulation was self-effectuating under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), meaning the dismissal took effect through the parties’ filing without a separate approval order. The court also concluded that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) did not require court approval of the parties’ agreement or notice to putative class members. The court reasoned that no class had been certified and that dismissal would not affect the claims of putative class members.

Disposition

The court directed the clerk to terminate the action from the docket. The order therefore closed the case after the stipulated dismissal of Obillo’s individual claims with prejudice and putative class claims without prejudice. Judge Peter H. Kang signed the order on June 2, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.