Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 30, 2025

McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-08442
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In McClellon v. Webull, Judge Swain denied counsel and service motions without prejudice and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Donte McClellon’s requests for appointed counsel and an order directing service were denied without prejudice; his permission to proceed without paying filing fees was also denied for an appeal.

What happened

In McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC, Donte McClellon, who was representing himself and had received permission to proceed without paying filing fees, asked the court to appoint a free lawyer and to order service of the summons.

The court denied both requests without prejudice. It said the case was too early to evaluate its merits for purposes of appointing counsel, and that service was premature because the complaint had not yet undergone the required screening for cases filed without paying filing fees. The clerk was directed to terminate the motions.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC · No. 1:24-cv-08442
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 30, 2025

Background

Donte McClellon was proceeding without a lawyer and had permission to proceed without paying filing fees. He filed two motions seeking appointment of free legal counsel and one motion asking the court to order service of the summons. The case was against Webull Financial LLC.

Appointment of counsel

The court considered the factors governing requests for pro bono counsel, including the apparent merits of the case, McClellon’s efforts to obtain a lawyer, and his ability to investigate and present the case without assistance. The court stated that the merits factor receives the most attention, but found that the case was too early for it to assess the merits. It therefore denied the two motions for counsel without prejudice to renewal at a later date.

Service of the summons

McClellon also requested an order directing service. The court explained that cases filed without paying filing fees must first undergo screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). That screening determines whether the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or seeks money from a defendant who is legally immune from that relief. Because the complaint had not yet been screened, the court denied the motion for service without prejudice as premature.

Disposition

The court denied the motions without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate them. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order on May 30, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.