Sumlin v. CSB Local, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-09993
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Sumlin v. CSB Local, LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 2, 2025, or dismissal with prejudice.
Dennis Sumlin and CSB Local, LLC. The action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle, subject to a possible restoration request by July 2, 2025; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
What happened
In Sumlin v. CSB Local, LLC, Dennis Sumlin told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, but an application to restore had to be made by July 2, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no timely restoration request was made, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored under that order.
The detailed version
- Sumlin v. CSB Local, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-09993
- Vyskocil
- June 2, 2025
Background
Plaintiff Dennis Sumlin filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the claims’ substance or the proposed settlement’s terms.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by July 2, 2025.
Effect of the Order
The order provided that if no application to restore the action was made by July 2, 2025, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion resolved the case based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle and did not decide the underlying claims.
Judge
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on June 2, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.