Austin v. Crumbly Group Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:25-cv-01749
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Patrick Austin v. Crumbly Group Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 3, 2025.
Patrick Austin, Crumbly Group Inc. d/b/a Crumbly Cafe & Bakery, and 1729 Second Avenue LLC.
What happened
Patrick Austin v. Crumbly Group Inc. involved a letter telling the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and filed an application by July 3, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil stated that if no timely application was filed, the dismissal would be with prejudice. She also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely and directed the Clerk to terminate the letter motion.
The detailed version
- Austin v. Crumbly Group Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-01749
- Vyskocil
- June 3, 2025
Background The parties informed the court by letter that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement terms.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted only if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and an application to restore the action was made by July 3, 2025.
The court stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. It adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely and requested that the Clerk of Court terminate the letter motion at ECF No. 15.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.