German v. United States
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:22-cv-07409
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In German v. United States, Judge Schofield denied Joel Reyes German’s petition under § 2255 and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.
Joel Reyes German’s federal post-conviction petition was denied, and the related civil case was closed; the United States was the respondent.
What happened
In German v. United States, Joel Reyes German asked the federal court to vacate his sentence under a law allowing federal prisoners to challenge their convictions or sentences.
The judgment says the court denied the petition for the reasons stated in an opinion and order dated June 3, 2025. The court also said it would not issue a certificate of appealability, which is required to appeal this type of ruling, and closed the civil case.
Judge Schofield entered judgment on June 4, 2025. The provided judgment does not include the court’s underlying reasons for denying the petition.
The detailed version
- German v. United States · No. 1:22-cv-07409
- Lorna Schofield
- June 4, 2025
Background
Joel Reyes German was the petitioner, and the United States was the respondent. German filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a procedure that allows a federal prisoner to seek to vacate, set aside, or correct a federal conviction or sentence. The judgment also lists a related criminal docket, No. 6 CR. 494-3 (LGS).
Ruling
The court stated that, for the reasons in its Opinion and Order dated June 3, 2025, German’s petition was denied. The judgment does not reproduce those reasons, so the provided text does not show whether the court reached the petition’s underlying claims or resolved it on a threshold ground.
The court further stated that German had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied. It therefore ordered that a certificate of appealability would not be issued. The civil case, No. 22-cv-7409, was closed, and judgment was entered.
Effect
The denial affected German’s § 2255 petition and resulted in closure of the civil case. The provided judgment does not state any additional relief or disposition concerning the related criminal docket.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.