Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 2, 2025

Uchemmadu v. Warden, Superintendent, NYC Dept. of Correction

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04487
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Uchemmadu v. Warden, Judge Swain transferred Uchemmadu’s detention petition to Brooklyn’s federal district court.

Who this affects

Nwaodu Uchemmadu’s detention petition will proceed, if at all, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; the Southern District of New York closed its case.

What happened

In Uchemmadu v. Warden, Superintendent, NYC Dept. of Correction, Nwaodu Uchemmadu filed a self-represented petition challenging his detention arising from pending Brooklyn criminal proceedings.

Uchemmadu was detained on Rikers Island. The court found that both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York could hear his petition, but the criminal proceedings were pending in Kings County, which is in the Eastern District.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice and closed the case in the Southern District. The court also said that no certificate allowing an appeal would issue and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Uchemmadu v. Warden, Superintendent, NYC Dept. of Correction · No. 1:25-cv-04487
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 2, 2025

Background

Nwaodu Uchemmadu, who was incarcerated at the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island, filed a self-represented petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the lawfulness of his detention arising from criminal proceedings pending in Brooklyn, Kings County, New York.

Jurisdiction and Transfer

For a detention petition under Section 2241, the court generally must have authority over the person responsible for the petitioner’s custody. The court explained that jurisdiction generally lies in the federal district where the petitioner is confined. Rikers Island is generally understood to fall within both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, so both districts could consider Uchemmadu’s petition.

Uchemmadu’s criminal proceedings were pending in the Criminal Part of the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, under Indictment No. 72866/23. Because that court is located in the Eastern District of New York, the Southern District transferred the petition to that district under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer in the interest of justice. The order closed the case in the Southern District.

Other Rulings

The court stated that Uchemmadu had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied, so it would not issue a certificate of appealability. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

The court transferred the Section 2241 action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and closed the case in the Southern District. The order did not decide whether Uchemmadu’s detention was lawful.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.