Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 3, 2025

Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:24-cv-04418
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp., Judge Halpern ordered settlement filings by June 23, 2025, dismissed pending motions as moot, and canceled conferences.

Who this affects

The parties, whose settlement filing was due by June 23, 2025; any pending motions were dismissed as moot, and all conferences were canceled.

What happened

In Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp., the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court ordered the parties to file by June 23, 2025, either a joint settlement submission with a signed agreement or a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. The court also dismissed any pending motions as moot and canceled all conferences.

Judge Halpern issued the order on June 3, 2025. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp · No. 7:24-cv-04418
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
June 3, 2025

Background

The court stated that it had been informed that the parties reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement terms, or the pending motions.

Order

The court ordered the parties to file by June 23, 2025, either: (1) a joint submission required for court review of the settlement, together with a fully signed proposed settlement agreement; or (2) a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.

The court dismissed any pending motions as moot, meaning they no longer required a ruling, and canceled all conferences.

Disposition

The order addressed the settlement process and related case-management matters. It did not decide the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.