Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 5, 2025

Cubias v. Vyse Realty LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-07713
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Cubias v. Vyse Realty LLC, Judge Failla granted the parties’ request for a two-week extension to submit settlement materials.

Who this affects

All parties, because the deadline to submit the settlement agreement and approval motion was extended to June 20, 2025.

What happened

In Cubias v. Vyse Realty LLC, the parties asked for more time to finalize a settlement agreement and request court approval. The existing deadline was June 6, 2025.

The parties requested a two-week extension, until June 20, 2025, and said no other deadlines would change. They also stated that this was their second extension request.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the request and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 26. The order did not address the underlying dispute or the settlement’s terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cubias v. Vyse Realty LLC · No. 1:24-cv-07713
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
June 5, 2025

Background Counsel for the defendants wrote on behalf of all parties to request a brief extension of the deadline for submitting a settlement agreement and a motion asking the court to approve it. The parties said they had worked diligently and cooperatively to finalize the settlement terms. The existing deadline was June 6, 2025, and they requested a new deadline of June 20, 2025. They stated that no future deadlines would be affected and that this was their second extension request.

Ruling Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 26. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims or address whether to approve the settlement itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.