Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.OtherFiled June 6, 2025

Camacho v. American Express Company

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:24-cv-02408
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

Camacho v. American Express: Judge Cronan ordered a conference to discuss standing allegations and possible briefing or amendment.

Who this affects

Philip Camacho and American Express Company, as well as the people Camacho seeks to represent.

What happened

Camacho v. American Express Company involves Philip Camacho’s lawsuit against American Express Company, brought individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.

The court directed the parties to attend a telephone conference on June 11, 2025, to discuss whether Camacho’s amended complaint adequately alleges an injury supporting standing. The parties must also be prepared to address supplemental briefing or another opportunity to amend.

Judge Cronan did not decide the standing issue or whether further briefing or amendment would be allowed. The order only set the conference and provided instructions for attending it.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Camacho v. American Express Company · No. 1:24-cv-02408
Judge
John Cronan
Date
June 6, 2025

What the Court Ordered

The court directed the parties to appear by telephone for a conference on June 11, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. The conference will address whether Philip Camacho’s First Amended Complaint adequately alleges that he suffered an injury in fact for purposes of establishing standing. The opinion cites TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021).

The parties must also be prepared to give their views on whether supplemental briefing or further permission to amend the complaint would be appropriate. Unless the court orders otherwise, the conference will be held through Webex.

What the Order Did Not Decide

The court did not rule on whether Camacho has standing, whether the amended complaint is legally sufficient, or whether supplemental briefing or further amendment will be permitted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.