Baek v. Sam Won Garden New York Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-09418
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Baek v. Sam Won Garden New York Inc., Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after settlement, allowing restoration by July 7, 2025, if necessary.
The order affects Seungcheol Baek, Sam Won Garden New York Inc., QB Hospital Inc., and Toni Park by discontinuing their action subject to the stated deadline for restoring it.
What happened
Seungcheol Baek sued Sam Won Garden New York Inc., QB Hospital Inc., and Toni Park. The court received a letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court ordered the action discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any restoration request had to be made by July 7, 2025.
If no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all other dates and deadlines, including the June 10, 2025 conference.
The detailed version
- Baek v. Sam Won Garden New York Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-09418
- Vyskocil
- June 6, 2025
Background Seungcheol Baek brought this action against Sam Won Garden New York Inc., QB Hospital Inc., and Toni Park. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. The parties informed the court by letter that they had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuation was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and submitted an application to restore the action by July 7, 2025.
The court further stated that if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored under that order. All other dates and deadlines, including the conference scheduled for June 10, 2025, were adjourned without a new date.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.